Rehman

Johnson v. Rehman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20202:14-cv-01454California1,799 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT JOHNSON, No. 2:14-cv-01454-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AZIZUR REHMAN and OMAR

GHAITH,

15 Defendants.

17 Through this suit, Plaintiff Scott Johnson (“Plaintiff”) sought damages and 18 injunctive relief against Defendants Azizur Rehman and Omar Ghaith (collectively, 19 “Defendants”) for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. 20 § 12101, et seq., and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 51 (“Unruh 21 Act”). Plaintiff had encountered various physical barriers when attempting to access 22 Defendant Ghaith’s store on Defendant Rehman’s property in Sacramento, California. 23 On July 8, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, awarding 24 injunctive relief and statutory damages in the amount of $8,000. ECF Nos. 50, 51. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 Plaintiff now moves for attorney’s fees, ECF No. 52, and that motion is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff is entitled to $12,775 in attorney’s fees…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.