Bacon
Bacon v. Pape Truck Leasing, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFRED HOWARD BACON, No. 2:16-cv-02664-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAPE TRUCK LEASING, INC. and
ESTENSON LOGISTICS, LLC,
15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Alfred Howard Bacon (“Plaintiff”) filed this suit against Pape Truck Leasing, Inc. (“Pape”) and Estenson Logistics, LLC (“Estenson”) alleging negligence and negligence per se. Presently before the Court are Pape’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 33, and Estenson’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 39. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are GRANTED.1 /// /// /// /// 27 1 Because oral argument would not be of material assistance, the Court ordered these matters submitted on the briefs. E.D. Local Rule 230(g). BACKGROUND2 2 A. Plaintiff’s Employment with Estenson Estenson, a trucking company, had a contractual agreement with Quality Driver Solutions, Inc. (“Quality”), a temporary manpower agency, to provide…