Swarthout
(HC) Pereira v. Swarthout
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD JOSEPH PEREIRA, No. 2:14-cv-0530 KJM AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 16, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice to that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 44. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. …