Baldwin

(PC) Garcia v. Baldwin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20201:19-cv-00184California4,184 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUILLERMO GARCIA, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00184-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) SCREENING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF v. ) LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CERTAIN

M. BALDWIN, et.al., ) CLAIMS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR ) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE Defendants. ) APPLICABLE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ) ) ) ) [ECF No. 23] )

Plaintiff Guillermo Garcia is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 19 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

22 I

RELEVANT HISTORY

24 On February 8, 2019, the instant action was removed from the Tuolumne County Superior 25 Court. 26 On February 22, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, 27 and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable retaliation claim against only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.