(SS) Linville Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL KEILEN LINVILLE, JR., No. 2:18-cv-2135-MCE–KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 OnJanuary 9, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. ECF No. 26. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed denovo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No.26) are ADOPTEDin full; 1…