Kernan

(PC) Thornberry v. Kernan

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20202:17-cv-00953California2,286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL LEE THORNBERRY, No. 2:17-CV-0953-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. BAL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. See ECF No. 64. Defendants have filed an opposition, see ECF No. 92, and plaintiff has filed a reply, see ECF No. 96. Also before the court is plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. See ECF No. 63. 21 I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS This action proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint. See ECF No. 9. The first amended complaint was determined to be appropriate for service on March 8, 2018. See ECF No. 14. As outlined in the court’s order, plaintiff names the following as defendants: (1) James Chau; (2) C. Smith; (3) M. Bobbala; (4) Michael Felder; and (5) J. Bal. Defendants Chau and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.