Santiago

Santiago v. Chipotle Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20202:17-cv-02350California1,549 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA SANTIAGO, No. 2:17-cv-02350-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER CHIPOTLE SERVICES, LLC, Defendant. 16 By way of this action, Plaintiff Maria Santiago (“Maria”) seeks to recover for injuries sustained when she was terminated from her employment with Defendant Chipotle Services, LLC, (“Defendant”) after purportedly requesting accommodations for her alleged physical disability. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16) by which it argues that primarily that: (1) “Plaintiff’s Disability Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate, Failure to Engage in the Interactive Process, and Wrongful Termination Claims Fail because Plaintiff was not disabled”; and (2) her retaliation and intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) claims and her request for punitive damages, fail as a matter of law. Def.’s Mot., ECF Nos. 16-2, at 10, 26 1 Given this Court’s disproportionately high case load, and in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.