(PS)Giddens

(PS)Giddens v. Solano County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20202:19-cv-00019California2,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RICHARD GIDDENS, No. 2:19-cv-0019-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SOLANO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 15 This case is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). ECF No. 38. For the reasons that follow, the motion should be granted.2 I. Factual Allegations The first amended complaint alleges that in June 2018, plaintiff was involved in an altercation at the Solano County Government Center. ECF No. 24 ¶¶ 14-16. Plaintiff claims that he subsequently submitted a public records request pursuant to California’s Public Records Act, Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 6250, et seq., to defendant County of Solano (the “County”) to obtain digital video recordings of the incident. Id. ¶ 17. Shortly thereafter, defendant Daniel Wolk, an attorney

This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.