Corral

Corral v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20202:19-cv-00376California3,519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK CORRAL, individually, and on No. 2:19-cv-00376-MCE-CKD behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC dba MR. COOPER, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendant. 18 Through the present lawsuit, Plaintiff Frank Corral (“Plaintiff”) seeks relief from his mortgage service provider, Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC dba Mr. Cooper (“Defendant”) on grounds that Defendant’s loan handling violated various laws, including the federal Electronics Funds Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1693, et seq. (“EFTA”) as well as three California statutory provisions, including its False Advertising Law, Cal. Business & Professions Code §§ 17500, et seq. (“FAL”), Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Business & Professions Code §§ 17200, et seq (“UCL”) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1770, et seq. (“CLRA”). Plaintiff alleges that Defendant made charges against his bank account in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.