Usher

(PC) Bradford v. Usher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20201:17-cv-01128California983 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Case No. 1:17-cv-01128-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO

v. FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT C. OGBUEHI, et al., (ECF Nos. 38, 56) Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff and Defendants Usher, Rimbach, German, Ulit, Spaeth, and Sao have all consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF Nos. 8, 34.) This action currently proceeds on Plaintiff’s claim against Defendants Usher, Rimbach, German, Ulit, Spaeth, and Sao, in their individual capacities, for violation of the Eighth Amendment based on Plaintiff’s allegations related to Valley Fever. (ECF No. 21.) On December 23, 2019, Defendants filed a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.