Knoll

(PC) Wheaten v. Knoll

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20201:18-cv-00885California837 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DERRICK WHEATEN, Case No. 1:18-cv-00885-AWI-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

S. KNOLL, et al., (Docs. 35, 62) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Derrick Wheaten is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff’s operative claims are for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Doc. 15 at 1.) This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 5, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 35.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on August 19, 2019, to which Defendants filed a reply. (Docs. 38-41.) On September 3, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.