Seitz

(PC) Lipsey v. Seitz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20201:18-cv-00766California984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., Case No. 1:18-cv-00766-AWI-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

B. SEITZ, et al., (Doc. 20)

Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey, Jr., is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 and California Civil Code section 52.1 (Bane Act). (See Docs. 9, 26.) In his third amended complaint, Plaintiff names B. Seitz, S. Kernan, and R. Diaz as defendants. (Doc. 26 at 2-3.) On February 13, 2020, the Court issued findings and recommendations to dismiss Kernan as a defendant, but allowed Plaintiff’s claims against Seitz and Diaz to proceed. (Doc. 27) Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. (Doc. 20.) Plaintiff requests that the Court order the Secretary of the California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.