(SS) Saiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20201:18-cv-01603California3,779 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 DEREK JAMES SAIZ, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-01603-BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S v. ) S OCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT ) ANDREW M. SAUL,1 Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) 16 ) 17 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Derek James Saiz (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.2 Having considered the briefing and record in this matter, the Court finds the decision of the

Andrew M. Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.