Muniz

(HC) Tamplin v. Muniz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20201:12-cv-01633California763 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DWIGHT TAMPLIN, JR., No. 1:12-cv-01633-AWI-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. [Doc. 86]

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COURT

WILLIAM MUNIZ, ORDER Respondent. [Docs. 84, 85] 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 2, 2020, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case issued Findings and Recommendation to deny Petitioner’s motion for court order dismissing the state court action with prejudice, or in the alternative, schedule an evidentiary hearing. (Docs. 84, 85, 86.) This Findings and Recommendation was served upon all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of that order. To date, no party has filed objections. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.