Roe 1 v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20201:19-cv-00270California2,035 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE ROE #1, et al., No. 1:19-cv-00270-DAD-BAM Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO PROCEED

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., PSEUDONYMOUSLY Defendants. (Doc. No. 16) 16 17 INTRODUCTION This matter is before the court on the individual plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to proceed in this action pseudonymously. (Doc. No. 16.) Each of the individual plaintiffs—Jane Roe #1, Jane Roe #2, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, John Doe #4, John Doe #5, and John Doe #6 (collectively, the “individual plaintiffs”)—has been subjected to a mental health evaluation under some form of alleged governmental authority. (Doc. No. 16 at 3.) As a result of these evaluations, each of the individual plaintiffs has been disqualified from acquiring, keeping, or bearing firearms, which they allege is a violation of their constitutional rights. (Id. at 1–5; see also Doc. No. 1 at 2–10.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.