Medina

(PC) Howell v. Medina

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20201:20-cv-00114California511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAREEM J. HOWELL, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00114-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

MEDINA, et.al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN ) CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS ) ) [ECF Nos. 12, 13] ) )

Plaintiff Kareen J. Howell is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On February 4, 2020, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff 21 stated a cognizable retaliation claim against Defendants Medina, Bennett, J. Burnes, J. Navarro, A. 22 Randolph, and J. Gallagher. (ECF No. 12.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended 23 complaint or notify the Court of intent to proceed only on the claim found to be cognizable. (Id.) 24 On February 20, 2020, Plaintiff filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.