(PC) Hutchens v. Shasta County Jail
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON JOESPH HUTCHENS, JR., No. 2:19-cv-2035 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
SHASTA COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty- three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify the court of a current address. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See L.R. 183(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned…