(PC) Hutchens v. Shasta County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20202:19-cv-02035California306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON JOESPH HUTCHENS, JR., No. 2:19-cv-2035 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

SHASTA COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty- three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify the court of a current address. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See L.R. 183(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.