Moss

(PC) Bartholomew v. Moss

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20202:17-cv-02551California576 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN BARTHOLOMEW, No. 2:17-cv-2551-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. MOSS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He requests an extension of time to file his reply in support of his motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 35. That request is granted. However, the court notes that on January 22, 2020 defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 31, and informed plaintiff of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of no opposition to that motion. In cases in which one party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, motions ordinarily are submitted on the record without oral argument. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(l). /////

1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998). “Opposition, if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.