Orr

Orr v. Brame

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20202:14-cv-00585California1,375 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo----

HARRISON ORR, individually, No. 2:14-cv-585 WBS EFB

13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER RE: ATTORNEY’S FEES AND EXPENSES ON REMAND CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, a public entity; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity; CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL OFFICERS BRAME, PLUMB, and DOES 1-10 individually; Defendants. 20 ----oo0oo---- This excessive force case is back before the court for the second time on remand from the Ninth Circuit for recalculation of attorney’s fees. In light of the Ninth Circuit’s decisions, the court orders as follows: (1) The appropriate lodestar amount for fees incurred prior to the first appeal of this case is $423,575, for the reasons discussed in the court’s December 22, 2015 and October 3, 2018 orders (Docket Nos. 203, 250). (2) Plaintiff is entitled to this entire lodestar amount, without any reduction, as ordered by the Ninth Circuit 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.