(PC) Britton v. California Superior Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBBY RAY BRITTON, JR., No. 2: 18-cv-2974 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 6, 2020, the undersigned granted plaintiff thirty days to file a third amended complaint as to his claim alleging false arrest on July 22, 2018, against the deputy sheriffs named as defendants in this claim and the due process claim against defendant Rolison contained in claim two. (ECF No. 30.) On February 14, 2020, plaintiff filed a third amended complaint. (ECF No. 31.) The third amended complaint does not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 8 because it does not contain a demand for relief, such as money damages and/or injunctive relief. For this reason, the third amended complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. The third amended complaint also does not allege potentially…