CDCR

(HC) McDonald v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20202:19-cv-02163California1,754 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIJAH McDONALD, No. 2:19-cv-2163 JAM DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CDCR, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges a 2018 cell search. He further claims that as a result of the search he was transferred to a segregated housing unit and some of his property was missing and some items were damaged. Presently before the court is petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 6) and his petition for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and recommend that the petition be dismissed. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Petitioner has filed a motion requesting to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 6.) Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.