Bardin

Bardin v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20202:20-cv-00245California378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL 02/20/2020

on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION oe 7D oF □□□

IN RE: FORD MOTOR CO. DPS6 POWERSHIFT FILED

TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS LIABILITY he 20: 2020 LITIGATION EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MDL No. 2814

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —39)

On February 2, 2018, the Panel transferred 75 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Central District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 289 F.Supp.3d 1350 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 430 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Central District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Andre Birotte, Jr. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Central District of California and assigned to Judge Birotte. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.