Gill
(PC) Wolinski v. Gill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI, No. 2:19-cv-2369 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GURSHARN GILL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff challenges a January 26, 2019 rules violation report (“RVR”) and resulting conviction for assault on a correctional officer. Because plaintiff may be required to pursue this claim first in a habeas corpus proceeding under Heck v. Humphrey, this court ordered plaintiff to provide two items of information: (1) his conviction and sentence; and (2) his loss of good conduct credits resulting from the RVR conviction. (ECF No. 6.) In response, plaintiff provided the court with extensive briefing on the Heck issue and an answer to only one of the two questions. Plaintiff attaches to his response a document entitled “CDCR Credits Received/Lost.” That document shows that the January 26, 2019 RVR conviction resulted in a loss of 150-days of good…