(PS) Bynum v. County of Siskiyou Board of Supervisors

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20202:20-cv-00150California1,355 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURA BYNUM, Case No. 2:20-cv-00150-TLN-DMC Petitioner, v. SUA SPONTE REMAND ORDER COUNTY OF SISKIYOU BOARD OF

SUPERVISORS,

15 Respondent,

KIMBERLY OLSON,

17 Real Party in Interest/Defendant 18 19 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant/Real Party in Interest1 Kimberly Olson’s (“Olson”) Notice of Removal and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 3.) The Court notes Olson has also filed a Motion to Dismiss the removed action for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 4.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby REMANDS the action to the Superior Court of California, County of Siskiyou, due to lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and DENIES Olson’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 3) and Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 4) as moot. 27 See ECF No. 2 (Certification and Notice of Interested Parties); ECF No. 1 at 7 (Petition attached to Notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.