Asher

Asher v. Credit Control, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20201:19-cv-01757California713 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TODD S. ASHER, Case No. 1:19-cv-01757-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING NATHAN C.

VOLHEIM’S PRO HAC VICE

v. APPLICATION

CREDIT CONTROL, LLC, (ECF No. 7) Defendant.

16 The court has read and considered the application of Nathan C. Volheim, attorney for Todd S. Asher, for admission to practice pro hac vice under the provisions of Local Rule 180(b)(2) of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for this District. The Local Rules of the Eastern District of California provides that an attorney is ineligible to appear and participate in a particular case pro hac vice if any of the following apply: “(i) the attorney resides in California, (ii) the attorney is regularly employed in California, or (iii) the attorney is regularly engaged in professional activities in California.” L.R. 180(b)(2). Mr. Volheim lists three other cases in which he has made application to be admitted to practice pro hac vice in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.