Carr

(HC) Rivers v. Carr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20201:19-cv-00292California818 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN WARREN RIVERS, No. 1:19-cv-00292-DAD-SAB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MELISSA PARR, (Doc. Nos. 11, 12, 15) Respondent.

16 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus purportedly brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On October 11, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that respondent’s motion to dismiss the pending petition be granted, petitioner’s motion for entry of default judgment be denied, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because petitioner has failed to satisfy the criteria to bring a § 2241 petition pursuant to the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). (Doc. No. 15.) The findings and recommendations were served on petitioner and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.