(PS) Miner v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 POCAHONTAS formerly known as No. 2:19-cv-1576 KJM DB PS
MADIHA MINER
12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS & SPACE
ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Madiha Miner is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint, motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and motion for subpoena duces tecum. (ECF Nos. 1-3.) Therein, plaintiff complains about invasion of privacy as a result of surveillance powers. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend. //// //// 1 …