(PC) Howard v. Brown, Jr.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20201:18-cv-01710California1,074 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL ANTHONY HOWARD, Case No. 1:18-cv-01710-DAD-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT
v. ISSUE FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS,
SGT. ENCINAS, et al., RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS
LENO AND W. HANNA BE DISMISSED
Defendants. FROM THIS ACTION, WITHOUT
PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(M)
TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE
17 Michael Howard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which includes state law claims. This case now proceeds “on Plaintiff’s complaint filed November 19, 2018 (ECF No. 1), on the following claims: Plaintiff’s claim against defendants J. Flores, J. Alejo, R. Nichols, H. Rodriguez, A. Loza, Leno, and A. Encinas for excessive force in violation of the Eighth 24 …