(PC) Howard v. Brown, Jr.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20201:18-cv-01710California1,074 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL ANTHONY HOWARD, Case No. 1:18-cv-01710-DAD-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT

v. ISSUE FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS,

SGT. ENCINAS, et al., RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS

LENO AND W. HANNA BE DISMISSED

Defendants. FROM THIS ACTION, WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FEDERAL

RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(M)

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

17 Michael Howard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which includes state law claims. This case now proceeds “on Plaintiff’s complaint filed November 19, 2018 (ECF No. 1), on the following claims: Plaintiff’s claim against defendants J. Flores, J. Alejo, R. Nichols, H. Rodriguez, A. Loza, Leno, and A. Encinas for excessive force in violation of the Eighth 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.