Torres

(PC) Solomon v. Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20201:18-cv-00615California730 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAXINE M. SOLOMON, No. 1:18-cv-00615-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

S. TORRES, Guard at Central California ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A Women’s Facility, CLAIM 15 Defendant. (Doc. Nos. 12, 15)

17 Plaintiff Maxine M. Solomon is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 27, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable § 1983 claim. (Doc. No. 15.) The findings and recommendations were served on both parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days of service. (Id. at 4.) Following the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.