Kellogg

(PC) Mejia v. Kellogg

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20201:19-cv-00509California229 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 JEREMY MEJIA, Case No. 1:19-cv-00509-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH

v. PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) D. KELLOGG, (ECF No. 23) Defendant. 10 On February 24, 2020, Plaintiff Jeremy Mejia and Defendant D. Kellogg filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ECF No. 23.) The stipulation further states that each party shall bear its own costs and fees. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides, in relevant part, that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing … a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” In this case, since Plaintiff and Defendant’s counsel signed and dated the stipulation of dismissal, the filing of the stipulation “automatically terminate[d] the action[.]” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.