(PC) Howell v. Randolph

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM J. HOWELL, Case No. 1:19-cv-0735-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS

v.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

A. RANDOLPH, et al., Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE; AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS NON-COGNIZABLE CLAIMS

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

19 Plaintiff’s complaint was recently screened and found to state a cognizable First Amendment retaliation claim against Correctional Officers at California State Prison in Corcoran, California (“CSP-Cor”) Rodriguez, Randolph, and Burnes, and a cognizable Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claim against Rodriguez and Randolph. No other claims were cognizable as pled. Plaintiff was then directed to file a notice as to whether he wished to proceed on his complaint as screened, to stand on his complaint, or to file an amended complaint. He has now filed a notice of his intent to proceed on the complaint as…