(PC) Beaton v. Valley State Prison

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20201:20-cv-00005California956 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL NIVARD BEATON, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00005-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DECLINING TO ADOPT FINDINGS v. ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS; AND

VALLEY STATE PRISON, ) GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND; ) Defendant. ) (Doc. No. 12) ) ) (THIRTY DAY DEADLINE)

Plaintiff Paul Nivard Beaton is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 5, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the instant action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. No. 12.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. (Id.) Plaintiff filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.