Baughman
(PC) Womack v. Baughman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY JEROME WOMACK, No. 2:17-cv-2708 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On October 22, 2019, the Ninth Circuit vacated this court’s April 18, 2019 order, and the district court’s August 26, 2019 order, and remanded the case for further proceedings, citing see Williams v. King, 875 F.3d5 503-04 (9th Cir. 2017) (“all parties, including unserved defendants, must consent in order for jurisdiction to vest with the magistrate judge.”). In light of such order, the September 25, 2019 findings and recommendations are also vacated. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I. Has Plaintiff Suffered Three Strikes Under 28…