Moore
(PC) Van Gessel v. Moore
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20201:18-cv-01478California11,329 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRISTOPHER ALLEN VAN GESSEL, 1:18-cv-01478-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE
vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS
MOORE, ALTUIRE, AND BALLESIL ON
THOMAS MOORE, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MEDICAL CLAIMS UNDER
THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT AND
Defendants. MALPRACTICE CLAIMS UNDER THE
FTCA, AND THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS
AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED, WITH
PREJUDICE, FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
20 I. BACKGROUND Christopher Allen Van Gessel (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). On October 26, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. …