Pfeiffer

(HC) Young v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20201:18-cv-01339California3,813 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOWARD YOUNG, Case No. 1:18-cv-01339-DAD-JDP Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS C. PFEIFFER, OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS Respondent. ECF No. 24 ORDER DENYING OUTSTANDING

MOTIONS

17 ECF Nos. 28, 29, 30, 36

ORDER DISMISSING MOTION TO RULE

ON PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT ECF No. 40 21 22 Petitioner Howard Young, a state prisoner without counsel, petitions for a writ of habeas 23 corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. He seeks relief from a 2017 denial of parole. Id. 24 Respondent moves for dismissal, arguing that petitioner did not exhaust his state-level remedies 25 on one of his claims and that other claims are non-cognizable. ECF No. 24. Following 26 respondent’s motion, petitioner has twice moved to amend his petition, has requested leave to 27 conduct…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.