(PC) Howard v. Brown, Jr.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20201:18-cv-01710California924 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL ANTHONY HOWARD, Case No. 1:18-cv-01710-DAD-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

v.

SGT. ENCINAS, et al., Defendants. 16 Michael Howard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which includes state law claims. On February 24, 2020, the Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”). Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Byron Miller telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendants. During the Conference, and with the benefit of the scheduling conference statement provided by Defendants, the Court and the parties discussed relevant documents in this case and their possible locations. In addition to opening discovery generally, the Court ordered that certain documents that are central to the dispute be promptly produced. Therefore, in an effort to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.