(PC) Howard v. Brown, Jr.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL ANTHONY HOWARD, Case No. 1:18-cv-01710-DAD-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
v.
SGT. ENCINAS, et al., Defendants. 16 Michael Howard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which includes state law claims. On February 24, 2020, the Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”). Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Byron Miller telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendants. During the Conference, and with the benefit of the scheduling conference statement provided by Defendants, the Court and the parties discussed relevant documents in this case and their possible locations. In addition to opening discovery generally, the Court ordered that certain documents that are central to the dispute be promptly produced. Therefore, in an effort to…