Levy

Levy v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20202:18-cv-02387California651 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

S USANA ALCALA WOOD, City Attorney (SBN 156366) KATHLEEN T. ROGAN, Senior Deputy City Attorney (SBN 186055) KRogan@cityofsacramento.org

CITY OF SACRAMENTO

915 I Street, Room 4010 Sacramento, CA 95814-2608 Telephone: (916) 808-5346 Facsimile: (916) 808-7455 5 Attorneys for the CITY OF SACRAMENTO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BYRON H. LEVY, Case No.: 2:18-cv-02387-TLN-DB

Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

TO TAKE PLAINTIFF AND

DEFENDANT’S DEPOSITION, vs. DISCLOSE EXPERTS, AND FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS

CITY OF SACRAMENTO,

Defendant. 16 Pursuant to Rule 16, a party may seek to modify a scheduling order, including modification of a discovery cut-off date “for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4).) “good cause” exists when a scheduling deadline “cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.” (Schaffner v. Crown Equipment 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.