Maric

Maric v. Alvarado

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20201:12-cv-00102California5,390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DENNIS MARIC, No. 1:12-cv-00102-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR

ALVARADO, et al., ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY

ADJUDICATION

Defendants. (Doc. 152)

17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment or 18 alternatively, summary adjudication pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 filed on October 22, 2019. (Doc. 152.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition. The Court reviewed the motion and supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The hearing set for January 29, 2020,1 was therefore vacated. (Doc. 162.) 23 For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied. 24 25 26 27 1 On December 2, 2019, the Court granted in part Plaintiff’s motion for continuance of the hearing on Defendants’ motion. (Doc. 161.) Plaintiff nonetheless failed to file an opposition by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.