Gamino

Gamino v. Yosemite Community College District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20201:18-cv-00391California4,555 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TAYLOR GAMINO, Case No. 1:18-cv-00391-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER v. (ECF No. 42)

YOSEMITE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

DISTRICT, et al., Defendants.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

16 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 18 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 19 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 20 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be 21 warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the 22 following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.