Allenby

(PC) Ring v. Allenby

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20201:18-cv-01283California614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW ARLINGTON RING, Case No. 1:18-cv-01283-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION

v. 14-DAY DEADLINE B. PRICE, et al., Clerk of Court to assign a District Judge Defendants.

16 On November 12, 2019, the Court issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim and granting him leave to file a second amended complaint. (Doc. 14.) On December 6, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff a 30-day extension of time to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 16.) Although more than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise comply with the Court’s order. Therefore, on January 22, 2020, the Court ordered the plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim and to obey a court order. (Doc. 17.) Plaintiff did not respond.1 The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.