Cano

(HC) Corral v. Cano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20202:16-cv-00143California588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILIP ROBERT CORRAL,

No. 2:16-cv-00143-JKS Petitioner,

ORDER

vs. [Re: Motion at Docket No. 24] STUART SHERMAN, Warden, Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison, Respondent. This Court denied Philip Robert Corral, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, habeas relief and a certificate of appealability on August 5, 2019. Docket Nos. 22, 23. Corral now submits a letter to the Court asking for direction on “the correct way to proceed” or for “more time to figure this process out.” Docket No. 24. The record reflects that Corral has not filed a notice of appeal, which is the first step required for appealing from this Court’s denial of his habeas petition. The notice must include “the party or parties taking the appeal by naming each one in the caption or body of the notice,” “the judgment, order, or part thereof being appealed,” and “the court to which the appeal is taken.” FED. R. APP. P. 3(c)(1). Most importantly, however, the notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the judgment. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Judgment was entered in this case on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.