(PC)Hendon
(PC)Hendon v. DeFazio
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS HENDON, No. 2:19-cv-01177-JAM-CKD-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. DEFAZIO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I. In Forma Pauperis Request Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. However, court records indicate that plaintiff has been deemed a “Three Strikes” litigant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Hendon v. Baroya, No. 1:09-cv-0911-MJS-P (E.D. Cal. July 29, 2010) (identifying three strikes); see also Hendon v. Kulka, No. 2:14-cv-2581-AC-P (E.D. Cal. August 3, 2015) (collecting cases); Hendon v. Kulka, No. 2:14-cv-1171-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. June 9, 2014). The court takes judicial notice of the three cases identified therein as § 1915(g) strikes, all of which were dismissed for 27 1 Judicial…