(HC) Stribling v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20201:19-cv-00834California863 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON LAMONT STRIBLING, Case No. 1:19-cv-00834-JDP Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS AMENDED PETITION FOR LACK

v. OF JURISDICTION K. CLARK, OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS Respondent. ECF No. 6 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE

17 Petitioner Aaron Lamont Stribling is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel on an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 6. On February 7, 2020, we ordered petitioner to show cause why his amended petition should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 9. Petitioner has failed to respond to our order to show cause and the time for doing so has passed. The matter is before the court for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, we must examine the habeas petition and order a response to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.