Jiminez

(PC) Taylor v. Jiminez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20201:19-cv-00068California2,967 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUNTAE TAYLER, Case No. 1:19-cv-0068-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION JIMINEZ, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

Defendants. STATE A CLAIM ECF No. 11 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Shauntae Tayler (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on October 10, 2019, is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 11.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.