Wright
Wright v. Dunne
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6 7 JACOB WRIGHT, KHRYSTYNE No. 2-15-cv-02671-TLN-CKD 8 WRIGHT and JONATHAN WRIGHT, as successors in interest of DANIEL LEE WRIGHT (deceased); JACOB WRIGHT, individually; KHRYSTYNE WRIGHT, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND individually; and JONATHAN WRIGHT, GRANTING IN PART WITH LEAVE TO individually, AMEND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, ON THE PLEADINGS. 13 v.
AMBER DUNNE; DR. JOHN PONDER;
DANA M. KERNAN; DR. SHELDON
SUSKAUER; DR. PAULA NEWMAN;
DR. SCOTT A. HEATLEY; DAVID
SMILEY; JOE A. LIZARRAGA; DOE 1;
AND DOE 2,
Defendants. 19 20 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Dana M. Kernan (“Kernan”) and Joe A. Lizarraga’s (“Lizarraga”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) (ECF No. 33) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) and Defendants Amber Dunne (“Dunne”), Dr. John Ponder (“Ponder”), Dr. Sheldon Suskauer (“Suskauer”), Dr. Paula Newman (“Newman”), Dr. Scott…