(PS) RamSing v. Sacramento County Superior Court
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAM RAMSING, No. 2:17-cv-2631-MCE-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment against defendant Sacramento Superior Court, but he failed to notice the motion for hearing as required by the court’s local rules. ECF No. 16; see E.D. L.R. Cal. 230(b). Accordingly, he was ordered to contact chambers to obtain available civil law and motion hearing dates. After he failed to comply with that order, plaintiff’s defectively filed motion for default judgment was denied without prejudice, and he was ordered to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to comply with the court’s order. ECF No. 18. In response, plaintiff argued that this case should not be dismissed. ECF No. 19. But he did not provide any explanation as to why sanctions should not be imposed. Nor did he take any action to prosecute this…