Burke

Burke v. City of Modesto

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20201:19-cv-00598California221 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 JACOB NATHANIEL BURKE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00598-LJO-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE

v. PURPOSES OF CLOSING THIS ACTION

AND ADJUST DOCKET TO REFLECT

CITY OF MODESTO, et al., VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF Defendants. CIVIL PROCEDURE (ECF No. 14) On February 28, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice with 17 each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has 18 been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 19 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or 29 attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to assign a district judge to 22 this case for the purpose of closing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.