Scoggin

Scoggin v. Turning Point Central California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20201:20-cv-00140California587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANELLE RENEE SCOGGIN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00140-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDER

TURNING POINT CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, (ECF No. 4) 15 Defendant. THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Danelle Scoggin (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se in this action, filed the complaint in this action on January 28, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, Plaintiff’s application was not adequately completed. In response to question three, Plaintiff indicates she receives disability and child support payments but does not describe the amounts received and what she expects to continue to receive. (ECF No. 2 at 1.) On January 31, 2020, an order issued requiring Plaintiff to file a long form application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.