Hanover Insurance. Co. v. Brian Goldman, MD

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20202:18-cv-01593California3,375 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, a No. 2:18-cv-01593-TLN-EFB New Hampshire Corporation, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

BRIAN GOLDMAN, MD, A MEDICAL

CORPORATION; BRIAN GOLDMAN; LAURA MACKIE, and MICHAEL HAGUE, Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Laura Mackie (“Mackie”) and Michael Hague’s (“Hague”) (jointly, “Defendants”)1 Motion to Dismiss, Alternatively, Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff Hanover Insurance Company (“Plaintiff”) opposed the Motion. (ECF No. 16.) Defendants replied. (ECF No. 24.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. /// /// /// 27 1 For the purpose of this Order, “Defendants” refers only to Mackie and Hague and omits Defendants Brian Goldman and Brian Goldman, MD, a Medical Corporation. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The instant dispute arises from an incident in which Defendant Brian Goldman’s (“Goldman”) former wife, Kimberly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.