Bobbala

(HC) Gleason v. Bobbala

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20202:20-cv-00406California622 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY GLEASON, No. 2:20-cv-00406 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

M.BOBBALA, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding in pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Nevertheless, the undersigned will recommend summary dismissal of the pending petition based on a failure to raise a federal cognizable claim. Petitioner is currently confined in California State Prison, located in Sacramento County. Petitioner has labeled his petition as a “petition for writ of habeas corpus; Rule 69. Fed. R. Civ. P. to the District Court Judge Assigned to this case.” ECF No. 1 at 1. In the petition, petitioner indicates “this is NOT a petition regarding criminal conviction 3/18/2016, this is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.